Is there a naming convention for git repositories?

asked12 years ago
last updated1 year ago
viewed336.5k times
Up Vote516Down Vote

For example, I have a RESTful service called Purchase Service. Should I name my repository:

  1. purchaserestservice
  2. purchase-rest-service
  3. purchase_rest_service
  4. or something else?

What's the convention? How about in GitHub? Should public repositories follow some standard?

12 Answers

Up Vote9Down Vote

I'd go for purchase-rest-service. Reasons:

  1. What is "pur chase rests ervice"? Long, concatenated words are hard to understand. I know, I'm German. "Donaudampfschifffahrtskapitänspatentausfüllungsassistentenausschreibungsstellenbewerbung."
  2. "_" is harder to type than "-"
Up Vote9Down Vote
Grade: A

I'd go for purchase-rest-service. Reasons:

  1. What is "pur chase rests ervice"? Long, concatenated words are hard to understand. I know, I'm German. "Donaudampfschifffahrtskapitänspatentausfüllungsassistentenausschreibungsstellenbewerbung."
  2. "_" is harder to type than "-"
Up Vote8Down Vote
Grade: B

Naming Conventions for Git Repositories

General Conventions:

  • Use lowercase letters, numbers, and hyphens
  • Avoid using spaces or special characters
  • Keep the name short and descriptive
  • Consider using the following format: [project-name]-[component-name]

For Your Example:

Option 2: purchase-rest-service is the most appropriate name based on the general conventions.

GitHub Conventions:

  • Public repositories on GitHub should follow the same general naming conventions as mentioned above.
  • Additionally, consider using a descriptive organization name to group related repositories.
  • Use a README file to provide clear documentation about the repository's purpose and usage.

Best Practices:

  • Use a consistent naming scheme: Establish a naming convention for all your repositories and stick to it.
  • Consider the target audience: Choose a name that is easily recognizable and relevant to the intended users.
  • Be specific: Avoid using generic names that could apply to multiple projects.
  • Use keywords: Include keywords in the repository name to make it easier to discover through search engines.
  • Avoid using vendor-specific names: Choose names that are not tied to specific technologies or vendors.

Additional Options:

  • Option 1: purchaserestservice is acceptable but not as descriptive as option 2.
  • Option 3: purchase_rest_service is not recommended as it uses underscores instead of hyphens.
  • Other potential options include:
    • purchase-api
    • purchasing-service
    • rest-api-purchase
Up Vote8Down Vote
Grade: B

In Git, there is no strict naming convention for repositories. However, it's common practice to choose descriptive and meaningful names for your repositories to make them easily identifiable.

In your case, since "Purchase Service" is RESTful and you want to include keywords like "purchase," "rest," and "service" in the name, here are some suggestions based on popular naming conventions:

  1. purchase-rest-service or purchase_rest_service with hyphens or underscores between words. This follows the popular kebab-case or snake_case style, which is common in the web development community.
  2. purchaserestservice with CamelCase or PurchaseRestService with PascalCase. These naming conventions capitalize the first letter of each word (except for the first word) and make it easier to read when using IDEs and build tools, such as Maven, Gradle, or Visual Studio.
  3. Use a combination of the above. For example, purchase-rest-service_v1 or PurchaseRestServiceProject.

As for public repositories on GitHub, it's essential to follow these best practices:

  1. Make your repository names clear and descriptive to make it easier for other developers to find and understand your projects.
  2. Follow the organization's or community guidelines, if applicable, such as naming conventions and styles used in that specific project or community. For example, some organizations use consistent prefixes in their repository names, such as myorg/.
  3. Document the repository using a README file, which should provide an overview of the project, instructions on how to set it up and contribute, and any other necessary information.
  4. Make your codebase clean, maintainable, and easy to understand by others in the community. This includes adding meaningful commit messages and maintaining proper documentation within the codebase.
Up Vote7Down Vote
Grade: B

There's no hard-and-fast rule for git repository naming conventions per se - but there are good practices you can follow to make it easier for others to understand what the repo does.

  1. purchaserestservice and purchase-rest-service are quite straightforward, easy to remember and also work well for public repositories on GitHub, with hyphenated versions being popular because of readability across platforms like Twitter, which tends to use this format more often than underscores or camel case.

  2. purchase_rest_service is a common convention used in the industry where developers typically include an underscore between words. It’s not as commonly used on platforms like GitHub that are designed for user-friendliness rather than strict adherence to naming conventions, but it could be your preference.

  3. camelCase (PurchaseRestService) can also work, particularly if you use the repo for a language or framework where variable and function names conventionally follow this format. However, GitHub usually discourages its usage due to less readability.

Overall, what's important is consistency within your team - so you decide on one style and stick with it. This should help make your repositories easier for others (and even for yourself) to understand. The repo README file could be a good place to provide a clear description of the service or functionality provided by this repository.

As for GitHub, yes it has some naming conventions that are generally agreed upon:

  • Repository names should be lowercase and dash separated (kebab-case). This makes them easy to type on command lines and read quickly.
  • Avoid using underscores in your repository name because many of the Git commands automatically replace underscores with dashes during their interpretation, which can cause confusion.
  • The description field of a repo should explain what is it for. If you need to store something like configuration or utility code that doesn't directly relate to business functionality, consider creating another repo and linking them together (e.g., purchase-rest-service and shared-utils).

Remember: "Better to be in the right mindset than to have the right name" by Seymour Cray.

Up Vote7Down Vote
Grade: B

purchase-service

Up Vote7Down Vote
Grade: B

Hello! I'm glad you're here, asking about naming conventions for Git repositories. This is an excellent question, as it can help maintain consistency and clarity in your projects.

While there is no strict convention enforced by Git or GitHub, the community has adopted some best practices. For your RESTful service called "Purchase Service," I recommend using purchase-rest-service. Here's why:

  1. Lowercase and separate words with hyphens (also known as "kebab-case"):

    • Easier to read
    • Compliant with Unix naming conventions
  2. Avoid special characters and spaces

  3. Use a descriptive name

    • Helps others understand the repository's purpose
    • Improves searchability

For GitHub, the naming conventions are similar. However, there are a few more considerations:

  1. Since URLs are case-sensitive, ensure that your repository's URL matches the casing you choose
  2. Avoid sensitive or controversial terms, as they may trigger filters or limit discoverability
  3. Keep the name concise, as long names may be truncated in some views

Here's a quick summary:

  • Use lowercase and separate words with hyphens (kebab-case)
  • Avoid special characters and spaces
  • Use a descriptive name
  • Follow GitHub-specific guidelines, like avoiding sensitive terms and keeping the name concise

Applying these guidelines, you can name your repository purchase-rest-service. Happy coding!

Up Vote6Down Vote
Grade: B

There is no one "right" way to name your git repositories. However, there are some common conventions and guidelines you can follow to make your repository names more readable and consistent. Here are some popular naming conventions for git repositories:

  1. The "kebab-case" format (e.g., purchaserestservice) : It is a simple convention that uses hyphens (-) to separate words in a repository name. This method makes it easy for people who have trouble reading capitalized words and can also be easily read by automated tools.
  2. The "snake-case" format (e.g., purchase_rest_service) : This is the convention for using underscores (_) to separate words in a repository name, which are both widely accepted.
  3. A descriptive title: Choose a descriptive title that summarizes the repository's contents or purpose, such as "Purchase Service Repository."

The choice of your repository's name should be based on what best represents it. The most important thing is to choose a name that you are comfortable with and can recall quickly. It's also critical to think about readability since the name will show up in search results, repository URLs, etc.

Up Vote6Down Vote
Grade: B

Standard Git Repository Naming Convention

In the Git repository naming convention, the first letter should be lowercase, and subsequent letters should use either lowercase or uppercase letters. The repository name should accurately reflect the content and purpose of the project.

For your example, the repository name "purchaserestservice" is a good choice because it accurately describes the project's scope.

GitHub Standard Naming Conventions

GitHub has some specific recommendations for repository naming:

  • Use lowercase and alphanumeric characters with no special characters.
  • Use underscores to separate words.
  • Avoid using periods, tabs, and other special characters.
  • Keep the repository name under 128 characters.

Additional Tips for Choosing a Git Repository Name

  • Choose a name that is descriptive of the project.
  • Use meaningful and concise words that accurately reflect the project's purpose.
  • Avoid using names that are too generic or too specific.
  • Use a name that is easy to remember and spell.
  • Consider the potential for future growth and changes in the project.
Up Vote6Down Vote
Grade: B

Naming Conventions for Git Repositories

There are several common naming conventions for git repositories. While there isn't a single, definitive answer, there are some general guidelines and best practices:

General conventions:

  • Descriptive and concise: Choose a name that clearly describes your project and is easy to remember. Keep it as short as possible.
  • Lower camel case: Use lowercase letters for most words, and camel case for phrases. For example, "PurchaseService" would be named "purchase-service."
  • Hyphens for compound words: Use hyphens to separate compound words. For example, "PurchaseOrder" would be named "purchase-order."
  • Singularize nouns: Use a singular noun for the repository name, even if the project is a collection of related items. For example, "Purchases" would be named "purchase."
  • Avoid punctuation and special characters: Don't include punctuation or special characters in your repository name.

Specific examples:

  • Your RESTful service called Purchase Service:
    • purchaserestservice: This name follows the convention of using a descriptive name followed by the service type ("rest").
    • purchase-rest-service: This name uses camel case and hyphenates compound words.
    • purchase_rest_service: This name uses underscores instead of hyphens.

GitHub conventions:

While there isn't a formal convention on GitHub, it's common practice to follow the same naming conventions as other projects in the same language or framework. For example, popular Python projects tend to use snake_case for variable names and camel case for class names.

Public repositories:

For public repositories, it's generally a good idea to use a name that is easy to find and remember. Consider the following factors:

  • Descriptive nature: The name should clearly describe your project and be easy for others to understand.
  • Uniqueness: Avoid naming your repository too similarly to other projects on GitHub.
  • Brand recognition: If you are associated with a brand, it may be helpful to include its name in your repository name.

Additional resources:

  • GitLab naming conventions: gitlab.com/blog/best-practices-for-naming-git-repositories
  • Atlassian Git branching conventions: confluence.atlassian.com/wiki/page/Branching_conventions
  • Stack Overflow thread on Git repository naming: stackoverflow.com/questions/416810/best-practice-for-naming-a-git-repository

Ultimately, the best name for your repository is one that you find clear, concise, and memorable.

Up Vote4Down Vote
Grade: C

The naming convention for Git repositories depends on personal preference or the specific use case. In general, a good Git repository name should be descriptive and easy to remember. When it comes to GitHub, public repositories follow certain conventions. For example, many GitHub projects start with "github.com". Additionally, some common naming conventions for GitHub projects include:

  • "myproject"
  • "gymyproject"
  • "github/myproject"

Ultimately, the best naming convention for Git repositories will depend on your specific use case and personal preferences.

Up Vote3Down Vote
Grade: C

Yes, there is a standard naming convention for git repositories known as the "Git Repository Name" or "GNU General Public License" (GNU GPLv2). In this name format, you include your project's name in quotation marks, followed by an underscore ("_"), then the version of the repository (e.g., "purchase-rest-service_1.0.0").

There is no strict rule for choosing a prefix or suffix for this type of name, but some people prefer to use short, simple and easy-to-remember names for their repositories. You can also include descriptive terms that make it easier for developers to find your repository based on the project's nature. For example: "purchaservice", "rest-service", "shopping-cart" or "product_list".

It is a best practice to have a consistent naming convention across all projects, so as to avoid confusion when searching for your repository in different repositories.

For GitHub users specifically, it's recommended that public repositories follow the naming convention mentioned above, but it ultimately depends on the specific project or team's preferences and policies.

Remember that there is no single "right" way to name a git repository, so use what works best for you and your projects.

Let's say we have 3 companies - Company A, Company B, and Company C. They each have a distinct cloud application (1) Sales, (2) Inventory, (3) Marketing. The three companies follow the naming convention suggested by the AI assistant for git repositories: Project names are in quotation marks with an underscore before the version number, such as "Sales_v1.0".

  • The company who is developing a project for Marketing does not want to use the same name as Company B's project, but it follows the naming convention perfectly.
  • The Sales team at Company A has started working on their first release and they decided to give it the number "1" in the repository names.

Question: What could be the potential names of each company’s application repository?

First, we need to note that both "Sales_v2.0" and "Inventory_v3.0" would break the convention as they are not within quotation marks. Also, there can only be one project for marketing; if Company B was developing Marketing's project with the name "Marketing", it contradicts our rule that no two companies share a repository name.

By applying proof by contradiction and using inductive reasoning from the data given:

  • If Company A was creating a "Sales_v1.0" application, it would have to break the naming convention because "Sales_v1.0" is not within quotation marks, which is one of the requirements for repository names. Therefore, by contradiction, we know that Company A's project must be of type 2 or 3, and its repository name could be either "Inventory_v2.0", "Marketing_v3.0" or "Sales_v3.0".
  • By inductive reasoning from the rule that companies should not have the same naming convention as another company and also with no more than one version number, it would imply that the other two companies - Company B and Company C, who are developing the "Inventory" and "Marketing" applications, cannot use a project name following the conventional "Sales_vX.0".

Answer: The potential names of each company’s application repository could be: Company A: "Inventory_v2.0", Company B: "Sales_v3.0", and Company C: "Marketing_v3.0"